Journal, lists, links, philosophy, but mostly just good stuff I have found on the web


About Me

My photo
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Search This Blog

Monday, August 16, 2010

Nine Stages of Giving

From Brad Leeper

Clipped from: http://www.xpastor.org/articles/leeper_generosity_new_normal.html

  • A consumer – a person that utilizes the church resources, but does not have the spiritual maturity to give. We want as many people as possible to enter the journey here, as this entry point often is their first step into engagement with God. We do not want them to stay here, but to grow in their understanding of God. Based on my frequent analysis of church-giving data, about one half of your people are here. Many never get past this stage.
  • Minimal giving – people give because there is some level of emotional attachment, because they are growing spiritually, and because they are asked to give. Consistently reviewing church-giving data finds about 25% of your people park here.
  • Involved giving – a person gives consistently because he or she is involved and has a strong emotional and spiritual motivation to give. Most churches have the standard 25% of people engaged at this level.
  • Giving as much as possible – rare, but you will find that person or couple that choose to live purposefully to fund Kingdom work. All income levels can embrace this value.
  • Giving to maximize tax advantages – giving as much as possible to legally take advantage of charitable tax laws.
  • Giving beyond regard to tax advantages – these people give because they want to give and sometimes in places that do not always provide a giving statement for tax purposes. For example, a family chooses to consistently give to the single parent family that is financially strapped.
  • Giving a percent of wealth – a person realizes how much he or she can give away and still live contentedly in our culture. A person does not have to be wealthy to give a percentage of their wealth. Some prefer different terminology, such as “becoming a percentage giver.” Every season, the family or person chooses to give an increased percentage to the church.
  • Capping wealth – I still remember the first successful businessperson who explained to me how he lived on a budget and capped his personal income well below what he could have received. He gave away the balance. I was stunned that someone could even think this way, countering the American dream.
  • Estate giving – while still leaving an appropriate amount to heirs, a person determines to give the bulk of the estate to the church and Kingdom purposes.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Five Marketing Plan Questions

Here are five questions your marketing plan should answer:
  1. What/who are your targets?
  2. What do they care about? What outcome are they seeking?
  3. Where do you find them?
  4. What or who influences them?
  5. How do they want to engage and (eventually) buy?

Friday, July 02, 2010

Phony Psychic Techniques

From The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading by Ian Rowland.
See also Mind Control Wiki, 38 elements of cold reading

First is the Rainbow Ruse—the “statement which credits the client with both a personality trait and its opposite.” (“I would say that on the whole you can be rather a quiet, self effacing type, but when the circumstances are right, you can be quite the life and soul of the party if the mood strikes you.”)

The Jacques Statement, named for the character in “As You Like It” who gives the Seven Ages of Man speech, tailors the prediction to the age of the subject. To someone in his late thirties or early forties, for example, the psychic says, “If you are honest about it, you often get to wondering what happened to all those dreams you had when you were younger.”

The Barnum Statement, the assertion so general that anyone would agree.

  • “I sense that you are sometimes insecure, especially with people you don’t know very well.”
  • “You have a box of old unsorted photographs in your house.”
  • “You had an accident when you were a child involving water.”
  • “You’re having problems with a friend or relative.”
  • “Your father passed on due to problems in his chest or abdomen.”

The Fuzzy Fact, the seemingly factual statement couched in a way that “leaves plenty of scope to be developed into something more specific.” (“I can see a connection with Europe, possibly Britain, or it could be the warmer, Mediterranean part?”)

The Diverted Question takes a piece of solid information and extrapolates unspoken details that are very likely to be correct. The solid piece of information could come from a direct question, or noticing the type of car the client drives or any friends they might be with.

Some psychics are well versed in how an expensive purse is different from a lookalike knock off purse. This says volumes for the reading.

"I see that you have a keen eye. First your eye is always set toward quality. You know what a good name brand is worth but your eye is also very shrewd to finding the best deal."


The Russian Doll is a way of "peeling the onion" so to speak, when a statement doesn't give you hit.

"I'm getting the impression of that you're making a move right now. Does that make sense?"

"No."

"Oh this could be not you per say, but someone close to you."

"No."

"Oh, not so much a physical move but really a transition... a major change of sorts."

"Well, my brother-in-law is finally getting a job."

"That's why this sticks out in my mind so much, this is long overdue!"

It took three attempts to get a hit and the misses fall by the wayside.

The key to the Russian Doll is if something doesn't match up then expand it into a different context.

The Jargon Blast can often be described as the "baffle them with bullshit" tactic. It does two things. First it establishes you as an authority in your method of reading (astrology, tarot, palmistry, etc.) by spewing out terms of your field most people have not put in the time to learn.

Secondly, as you use these terms to describe the reading the client will put whatever meaning to it that best fits.

"The two of swords is a card of the mind. In fact, it means that there is a decision that that is being weight. The five of wands goes well with this as it indicates there is a struggle... not a major one... but a bothersome one. These are conjoined cards which means that the struggle is affecting this decision. I don't know if this makes sense to you."

You are welcome to throw in completely unrelated jargon like "form a divergence" or "Conjoined cards"

The Good Chance Guess is a guess that has a better-than-normal chance of being correct. Example You were quite active as a child and people were concerned about your well being. You have a scar on your left knee. (BTW, you would be surprised how accurate that guess is!)

The Vanishing Negative
“Moving on to career matters, you don’t work with children, do you?”

No, I don’t.

“No, I thought not. That’s not really your role.”

Of course, if the subject answers differently, there’s another way to play the question: “Moving on to career matters, you don’t work with children, do you?”

I do, actually, part time.

“Yes, I thought so.”

Push Statements – stories that are made up out of whole cloth and usually don’t make sense to the client. The client goes away and ultimately tweaks the story until it fits something in their lives. The point being that he is such a good psychic that he even knows stuff that at first doesn’t make sense.

Fine Flattery statements are designed to flatter the client in a subtle way likely to win agreement. Usually, the formula involves the client being compared to “people in general” or “most of those around you”, and being declared a slight but significant improvement over them:

I have your late sister with me now. She tells me she wants you to know that she always admired you, even if she didn’t always express it well. She tells me that you are… wait, it’s coming through… yes, I see, she says you are in many ways more shrewd, or perceptive, than people might think.

Psychic Credits are character statements which credit the client with some form of psychic or intuitive gift, or at the very least a receptivity to others who possess such gifts:
This card, the King of Wands, is generally indicative of a perceptive or even a psychic ability of some kind. Of course we all have these gifts, but they do vary from person to person. In your case, it’s the second card in the higher triad, which is devoted to your personal profile. This suggests you have very strong and vivid intuitive gifts, and good instincts which will serve you well if you learn to trust them.

Sugar Lump statements offer the client a pleasant emotional reward in return for believing in the junk on offer. In general, the Sugar Lump relates to the client’s willingness to embrace the psychic ‘discipline’ involved in the reading, and to benefit from the insights thereby gloriously revealed:

Your heart is good, and you relate to people in a very warm and loving way. The tarot often relates more to feelings and intuition than to cold facts, and your own very strong intuitive sense could be one reason why the tarot seems to work especially well for you. The impressions I get are much stronger with you than with many of my clients.

The Greener Grass element is based on the fact that we all retain some fascination with the options in life that we did not take. You could say they form their own sub-set of the Jacques Statements referred to above:

I see indications of material success and professional advancement which are a credit to you, and which reflect your own drive and ability to get things done. You are the sort of person who delivers results, and this characteristic has brought its rewards. However, it has also brought its penalties. Although you would not necessarily advertise them too openly, I sense some feelings here of a potential desire for more domestic security, and a more stable home life. I would not go so far as to say this has been a serious problem for you, but I believe your loyalty to your career has not always delivered the returns you expected.

Forking.
If the client seems to reject the initial statement, the psychic can develop the same theme in the opposite direction, like this:

But this tendency is one you have learned to overcome, and these days it rarely comes to the fore. You have learned to accept yourself, and to be reconciled with your own special mix of gifts and skills. You have learned how damaging it can be to be too self-critical, and all credit to you for having matured past the self-critical stage.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Contractions in Postmodernism

Rosenau (1993) identifies seven contradictions in Postmodernism:

1. Its anti-theoretical position is essentially a theoretical stand.

2. While Postmodernism stresses the irrational, instruments of reason are freely employed to advance its perspective.

3. The Postmodern prescription to focus on the marginal is itself an evaluative emphasis of precisely the sort that it otherwise attacks.

4. Postmodernism stress intertextuality but often treats text in isolation.

5. By adamantly rejecting modern criteria for assessing theory, Postmodernists cannot argue that there are no valid criteria for judgment.

6. Postmodernism criticizes the inconsistency of modernism, but refuses to be held to norms of consistency itself.

7. Postmodernists contradict themselves by relinquishing truth claims in their own writings.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Leadership Guidelines in Turbulent Times

Great article

In January 2009, founder and chairman of India’s Satyam Computer Services—the “largest publically traded company you’ve never heard of”—Ramalinga Raju confesses to massive accounting fraud and resigns. In a five-page letter to the board, he described the problem saying, “It was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten.” In an instant, he left behind him, chaos, distrust, and plummeting moral among his more than 53,000 employees. But Riding the Tiger is not about how the Enron-like tragedy occurred, but how a leading through learning strategy calmed the chaos and helped the company recover and rebuild.

Leadership
Authors and former Satyam employees Pricilla Nelson (Global Director of People Leadership) and Ed Cohen (Chief Learning Officer) share the take-away lessons learned on the road to recovery and renewal. Step one was what they eventually called the “Lights On” strategy. That is “deciding exactly what must be done to keep the business moving and doing only that which is critical to help the organization stabilize.” They describe 6-steps—beginning with hold everything and build an adaptable stop-stop-continue plan—based on the two pillars of learning and communication.

Nelson and Cohen write, “Learning is critical for stabilizing the organization, providing guidance to leaders, communicating with employees, and keeping the business open.” Communication is critical. “The leaders who lead out loud—those who maintain transparency, approachability, and integrity—are the ones with whom people want to work, in good times and bad.”

Venkatesh Roddam, Director of VenSat Tech India was the CEO at Satyam BPO (a Satyam subsidiary), reflects on the resilience at Satyam, “To be faced with a crisis the magnitude of what Satyam dealt with and then one year later to be reborn and vibrant in a new avatar speak volumes about the value of a strong leadership culture. This resilience is the result of years of painstakingly implemented leadership strategies.” The authors stress the need for developing leadership guidelines in order to leverage learning and to assist leaders with the complicated people and relationship dimensions of the business. You can use these 12 guidelines as a basic for coaching conversations:
  1. Understand that we will never get back to normal: While it is comfortable to want to seek the status quo, “normal” in times of a crisis is constantly changing. Leaders need to move on to seek better ways of doing things, letting these new ways become the new normal.
  2. Take care of one another: Listening reduces anxiety. Provide regular updates on what is happening across the organization and expand inclusivity.
  3. React…pause…respond: The right response will be made once information gathering, integrity, an open heart, and seeking to understand have been considered.
  4. Talk—even when you don’t believe there is much to say: Overcommunication is essential during turbulent times. Consistent and continuous messaging prevents rumors from spreading and demonstrates the leaders’ approachability and transparency.
  5. Be visible—now is not the time to play hide-and-seek: People become fearful when the leader goes into hiding. As a leader, be present, inform comfort, and provide strength for others.
  6. Maintain integrity and high value morals: Current circumstances should not influence or distort your definition of integrity and other core values.
  7. Optimize costs, with retention in mind: Make cost optimization decisions keeping employee retention in mind. This allows leaders to assess risk and make more informed decisions.
  8. Be a brand ambassador: The organization needs people who are brand ambassadors. As brand ambassadors, you are responsible for representing the organization both internally and externally in a positive manner. This means you must refrain from making statements that might cause further turbulence.
  9. Assess and rebuild trust: Rebuilding an injured organization requires making difficult decisions that not everyone will understand. For this reason, you and other leaders must continuously asses and rebuild trust.
  10. Remember, leaders are human, too: Though there will be difficult times during a crisis, as leader, it is important to remain composed.
  11. Think like a child: Try to live “in the moment,” not allowing business to consume every moment. Work/life balance can exist, even in a crisis.
  12. Take care of your emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being: Don’t put any aspect of your well-being on hold. While change and uncertainty at work are draining, you cannot allow them to take over your life.
The authors say that 87% of businesses fail to recover from devastation such as this because they have “not correctly aligned their priorities for recovery, and more importantly re-growth. Too often the immediate focus is put on salvaging customer relationships and brand identity. The relationship with employees does not receive the same priority. Leaders do not communicate as much as needed leaving them wondering what the future holds for them and their colleagues. This dichotomy results in major turnover, far more than companies in crisis can withstand, and ultimately contribute to their failure.”

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Things Not to Write In an E-Mail

This is from Planet Money at National Public Radio.

Every e-mail you write could wind up in court. Everybody knows this, but people still act like it will never happen to them.

If you can't help yourself — if you just have to write that incriminating e-mail — you can at least avoid a few obvious red flags.

The lawyer appointed to figure out what went wrong at Lehman Brothers used lots of different search terms to mine 34 million pages of documents from the bank, Bloomberg News recently pointed out.

The searches are described in great detail starting on p. 158 of this section of the examiner's report. While some are technical — phrases like "mark to market," and the names of banks, auditors and the like — others are pretty general.

One search in particular targeted a bunch of words and phrases that anybody might use in an incriminating e-mail. They are:

  • stupid
  • huge mistake
  • big mistake
  • dumb
  • can't believe
  • cannot believe
  • serious trouble
  • big trouble
  • unsalvageable
  • shocked
  • speechless
  • too late
  • uncomfortable
  • not comfortable
  • I don't think we should
  • very sensitive
  • highly sensitive
  • very confidential
  • highly confidential
  • do not share this
  • don't share this
  • between you and me
  • just between us

Saturday, June 05, 2010

GE General Electric Programmable Clock Radio 7-4885



A great old radio.
I owned one for many years, until the keypad died, which is the usual end of this model.
It had two alarms and digital keypad entry for both the alarm and radio frequencies.
It also had multiple station memory.

They don't make them like this anymore.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Persuasion Through Mimicry

February 12, 2008

You Remind Me of Me

Artful persuasion depends on eye contact, but not just any kind. If one person prefers brief glances and the other is busy staring deeply, then it may not matter how good the jokes are or how much they both loved “Juno.” Rhythm counts.

Voice cadence does, too. People who speak in loud, animated bursts tend to feed off others who do the same, just as those who are lower key tend to relax in a cool stream of measured tones.

“Myself, I’m very conscious of people’s body position,” said Ray Allieri of Wellesley, Mass., a former telecommunications executive with 20 years in marketing and sales. “If they’re leaning back in their chair, I do that, and if they’re forward on their elbows, I tend to move forward,”

Psychologists have been studying the art of persuasion for nearly a century, analyzing activities like political propaganda, television campaigns and door-to-door sales. Many factors influence people’s susceptibility to an appeal, studies suggest, including their perception of how exclusive an opportunity is and whether their neighbors are buying it.

Most people are also strongly sensitive to rapport, to charm, to the social music in the person making the pitch. In recent years, researchers have begun to decode the unspoken, subtle elements that come into play when people click.

They have found that immediate social bonding between strangers is highly dependent on mimicry, a synchronized and usually unconscious give and take of words and gestures that creates a current of good will between two people.

By understanding exactly how this process works, researchers say, people can better catch themselves when falling for an artful pitch, and even sharpen their own social skills in ways they may not have tried before.

“Really good salespeople, and for that matter good con artists, have known about these skills and used them forever,” Jeremy Bailenson, a psychologist at Stanford, said. “All we’re doing now is measuring and describing more precisely what it is they’re doing, whether consciously or not.”

Imitation is one of the most common and recognizable behaviors in the animal kingdom. Just as baby chimps learn to climb by aping their elders, so infants pick up words and gestures by copying parents. They sense and mimic peers’ behavior from early on, too, looking up at the ceiling if others around them do so or mirroring others’ cringes of fear and anxiety.

Such behavioral contagion probably evolved early for survival, some scientists argue. It is what scatters a flock well before most members see a lunging predator.

Yet by drawing on apparently similar skills, even in seemingly trivial ways, people can prompt almost instantaneous cooperation from complete strangers.

In a recent experiment, Rick van Baaren, a psychologist at Nijmegen University in the Netherlands, had student participants go to a lab and give their opinions about a series of advertisements. A member of his research team mimicked half the participants while they spoke, roughly mirroring the posture and the position of their arms and legs, taking care not to be too obvious.

Minutes later, the experimenter dropped six pens on the floor, making it look like an accident.

In several versions of this simple sequence, participants who had been mimicked were two to three times as likely to pick up the pens as those who had not.

The mimicry had not only increased good will toward the researcher within minutes, the study concluded, but it also prompted “an increased pro-social orientation in general.”

That orientation applies to far more than dropped pens. In a study due out in the spring, Robin Tanner and Tanya Chartrand, psychologists at Duke, led a research team that tested how being mimicked might affect the behavior of a potential client or investor.

The team had 37 Duke students try out what was described as a new sports drink, Vigor, and answer a few questions about it. The interviewer mimicked about half the participants using a technique Dr. Chartrand had developed in earlier studies.

The technique involved mirroring a person’s posture and movements, with a one- to two-second delay. If he crosses his legs, then wait two seconds and do the same, with opposite legs. If she touches her face, wait a beat or two and do that. If he drums his fingers or taps a toe, wait again and do something similar.

The idea is to be a mirror but a slow, imperfect one. Follow too closely, and most people catch it — and the game is over.

In the study, the researchers set up the interviews so each student’s experience was virtually identical, except for the mimicking.

None of the copied participants picked up on the mimicry. But by the end of the short interview, they were significantly more likely than the others to consume the new drink, to say they would buy it and to predict its success in the market.

In a similar experiment, the psychologists found that this was especially true if the participants knew that the interviewer, the mimic, had a stake in the product’s success.

“This is somewhat counterintuitive,” Dr. Chartrand said in an interview. “Normally, you’d expect when people realize that someone was invested in a product and trying to sell it to them, their reaction would be attenuated. They’d be less enthusiastic.

“But we found that people who were mimicked actually felt more strongly about the product when they knew the other person was invested in it.”

Any amiable conversation provides ample evidence of this subconscious social waltz. Smiles are contagious. So is nodding, in an amiable conversation.

Accents converge quickly and automatically. A country chime or an Irish whistle can seemingly infect the voice of a New Yorker in a 10-minute phone call.

“I especially find myself falling into a Southern accent, which is crazy,” Mr. Allieri, the telecom executive, said. “I’m from Boston.

“But I think what good salespeople really do is pick up on physical cues and respond to them without thinking much about it.”

It is one thing to move like a naturally synchronized swimmer through the pools of everyday conversation without thinking, however. It is another to deliberately employ mimicry to persuade or seduce.

Dr. Bailenson, the Stanford psychologist, has been testing the effects of different forms of mimicry by programming a computer-generated figure, an avatar, to mirror the movements and gestures of people in a study.

He has found that his subjects pick up the mimicry when it is immediate and precise. If the avatar is slightly out of sync, however — waits four seconds, for instance — then the mimicking goes unnoticed, and the usual rules apply. The virtual creating comes across as warm and convincing, as if controlled by another human.

“The point is it’s a delicate balance to get it right, and I suspect that people who are good at this know how to do it intuitively,” Dr. Bailenson said.

Or they have developed ways to engage their skills indirectly.

Veldon Smith, a musician and legendary salesman living in Centennial, Colo., who spent 30 years in the automobile parts business before retiring a few years ago, said:

“One thing I always did, I learned as much as possible about a client before I visited, what their problem was, what they were worried about. Then I would go in with a story about myself being in the same predicament.

“So when I walked in, I was in exactly the same frame of mind as the customer. I was immediately on the same wavelength. Everything else kind of flowed out of that.”

One reason subtle mimicry is so instantly beguiling may be that it draws on and, perhaps, activates brain circuits involved in feelings of empathy.

In several studies, Jean Decety, a neuroscientist at the University of Chicago, has shown that some of the same brain regions that are active when a person feels pain also flare up when that person imagines someone else like a loved one feeling the same sting or ache.

A similar process almost certainly occurs when a person takes pleasure in the good fortune of a friend or the apparent enjoyment of a conversation partner, Dr. Decety said.

“When you’re being mimicked in a good way, it communicates a kind of pleasure, a social high you’re getting from the other person, and I suspect it activates the areas of the brain involved in sensing reward,” he said.

Social mimicry can and does go wrong. At its malicious extreme, it curdles into mockery, which is why people often recoil when they catch of whiff of mimicry, ending any chance of a social bond. Preliminary studies suggest that the rules change if there is a wide cultural gap between two people. For almost everyone else, however, subtle mimicry comes across as a form of flattery, the physical dance of charm itself. And if that kind of flattery doesn’t close a deal, it may just be that the customer isn’t buying.

Everyone has the right to be charmed but not seduced.

A Systemic Reason for Constant Price Increases.

This article, from Kate Lister at Open Forum, explains why companies would much rather raise prices than cut them, even if it costs them customers:

May 26, 2010 -

The quickest, easiest way to increase your income is to raise your prices. If you're worried about losing customers, do the math. You'll be surprised at how many you can lose and still make more money.

Here's an example. It's a bit dense with numbers, but stick with it. This is an important concept and one that will give you a distinct advantage over those who don't understand it.

Let's say your product or service sells for $200 and your cost is $150. Now you raise your price by 5 percent to $210 per unit and, as a result, you lose 10 percent of your customers.

Before

  • Price Per Unit: $200
  • Cost Per Unit: $150
  • # of Customers: 1,000
  • Gross Income: $200,000
  • Direct Costs: - $150,000
  • Gross Profit: $50,000
    Gross Profit Margin: 25%
After
  • Price Per Unit: $210
  • Cost Per Unit: $150
  • # of Customers: 900
  • Gross Income: $189,000
  • Direct Costs: - $135,000
  • Gross Profit $54,000
    Gross Profit Margin: 28.5714%

You're actually making $4,000 more profit with 100 less customers!

In fact, in this example, you could lose almost 17 percent of your business and still break even from a 5 percent price increase ($50,000 / 28.6% = $175,000).

  • # of Customers: 833
  • Gross Income: $175,000
  • Direct Costs: - $125,000
  • Gross Profit: $50,000

The same math shows why it's a very bad idea to offer discounts, figuring you'll make it up on volume. A 5 percent price decrease in this same situation would require a 25 percent increase in sales just to stay even.

Before

  • Price Per Unit: $200
  • Cost Per Unit: $150
  • # of Customers: 1,000
  • Gross Income: $200,000
  • Direct Costs: -$150,000
  • Gross Profit: $50,000
    Gross Profit Margin: 25%

After

  • Price Per Unit: $190
  • Cost Per Unit: $150,
  • # of Customers: 1,250
  • Gross Income: $237,500
  • Direct Costs: - $187,500
  • Gross Profit $50,000
    Gross Profit Margin: 21.0526%

That's an extra 250 customers you'll somehow need to woo with your new low prices!

If all that hasn't convinced you to raise your prices and NOT discount, consider that price buyers:

  • Are your least loyal customers
  • Complain more than premium price buyers
  • Expect more than premium buyers
  • Will blab about the deal they got to your full price customers

In a prior life, I owned a vintage airplane ride business. It was so popular we could hardly keep up with demand. We often had to turn customers away. Adding planes wasn't really an option as there aren't many of them around any more. Finding pilots whose spouses allowed them out to play with airplanes in their spare time wasn't easy, either.

Putting a spreadsheet to work, we did just the kind of math shown here to evaluate how much business we could afford to lose and still break even. Over the next two years, we eventually tripled our prices before we started to see any fall off in demand. Then we carefully tweaked them until we found that "just right" price that allowed us make the most amount of money with the least amount of work.

Having fewer customers saved us money in other ways. There was less wear and tear on the airplanes, less oil and spark plug changes, less frequent engine overhauls, fewer phone calls/staffing issues, a reduced need for pilots, and generally an easier time making money.

By this point, you're hopefully wondering about your own pricing strategy. Here's a tip. If no one's complaining about your prices or if you have more work than you can handle, you're due for a price increase, or two, or three. Back up those higher prices with a better product/service, better customer service, friendlier staff, or other value-added strategies, and you'll never have to worry about price wars again.

It's always easy to lower your prices if you find you've gone too far. Better yet, keep your prices high to maintain the perceived value of your product or service and offer frequent-buyer coupons, limited-time only-discounts, bulk purchase offers, or other such programs that increase the per customer purchase, and/or lower your unit or fixed costs.

Price wars, discounting, and other price-based competition may make you busier, but as the numbers show, busier is not always better. Unless you "make it up on volume" you'll be out of business and a whole lot more tired than if you'd just left your prices alone.

We'd love to hear your pricing successes (or failures). Has raising your prices worked for you? How about lowering them? Sharing is good. Do tell.

Over the past thirty years, Kate Lister has owned and operated several successful businesses and arranged financing for hundreds of others. She’s co-authored three business books including Undress For Success—The Naked Truth About Making Money at Home (Wiley, 2009) and Finding Money—The Small Business Guide to Financing (2010). Her blogs include Finding Money Advice and Undress4Success.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

First Vietnam Questionarrie from Alex Jordan

Howdy,

Glad to help. Most answers are shown with the questions.

I was a recon pilot in Vietnam. I was based at Pleiku, Vietnam and Nakom Phanom, Thailand. I flew missions in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
After I returned to the U.S., I flew transport missions to Vietnam monthly. I few enough of these to be credited with a second tour.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Mike

Michael L. Pearson
1907 Oak Knolls Ct SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
mlpearso@aol.com
H: (319) 362-1023 C: (319) 573-9188


-----Original Message-----
From: Toby and Elaine JORDAN <rejordan79@msn.com>
Sent: Mon, May 10, 2010 9:23 am
Subject: Alex needs some Homework Assistance!

Hey all - last week Alex got an assignment in U.S. History & asked us to help him find some people to answer some questions. We as parents totally spaced and forgot about it! The assignment is due Wednesday morning, so if you are able to help by either answering the questions or finding/knowing someone that can, we'd appreciate it if you could just e-mail back the answers to us by Tuesday night so he has time to put everything together into a report.

Alex needs to ask questions of a Veteran from each of these 3 wars: Vietnam War, Korean War, World War II

The questions are:

1) Why did the U.S. enter the war?
Big Picture Answer: to stop the spread of Communism. Communism was making gains in Europe, Africa, Latin America, and Asia. George F. Kennan sent a message, known as The Long Telegram, to the State Department (1946), followed by an anonymous article in Foreign Affairs magazine that outlined the "Containment Strategy" which became the official plan for the conduct of the Cold War. There was a fear that, if the Communist expansion was to continue, all of SouthEast Asia would "fall like dominoes."

Public opinion was greatly influenced by two popular books at that time:
1) The Night They Burned the Mountain (1960), by Tom Dooley, a medical missionary in Laos, and
2) The Ugly American (1959), by Eugene Burdick and David Lederer.
These books described the injustices going on in SouthEast Asia and the failures of U.S. foreign policy. They raised the idea that "something must be done."

Shorter Answer: Muddling through. France had tried to regain Indochina, including Vietnam after WW II. They failed, losing the key battle at Dien Bien Phu. They asked the U.S. to take over. Eisenhower agreed. Kennedy introduced military advisors. Johnson expanded to a full scale war, using the dubious Gulf of Tonkin incident as his excuse.

2) What were the goals of the war?
To contain Communism and prevent the Domino Effect

3) How were you treated by people when they learned you were in the service?
Very well.

4) How were you treated in uniform?
Very well. But I was almost always in or near a military base.

5) How were you received in the countries where you fought?
Very well. I did not interact much with the people in Vietnam. In Thailand, the people were half pro-US and half pro-Ho Chi Minh. But they treated us well because we were the big dog with lots of power and money.

6) Do you feel the government was honest about its war goals?
For the most part. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was phony, but the strategy had been well laid out.

The tactical strategy prevented a military victory, out of fear of the Chinese and Soviets.

The press continually mis-characterized what was going on. Especially, Cronkite.

7) How did you feel when the war ended?
Glad to get out of it. It was a waste without a victory strategy.

8) Has the government shown its appreciation for your wartime efforts? If so, how?
I got some medals (Distinguished Flying Cross and 5 Air Medals).
I got paid every month.

That's all I expected.

Thank you so much for helping! - Alex, Toby & Elaine

2nd Questionarie from Alex Jordan




No problem. See my answers below. Pictures attached.

Michael L. Pearson
1907 Oak Knolls Ct SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
mlpearso@aol.com
H: (319) 362-1023 C: (319) 573-9188


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Jordan
To: mlpearso@aol.com
Sent: Wed, May 12, 2010 6:47 pm
Subject: One more favor?!

Mike - can you answer some more?! I actually had 2 assignments. One was to interview a Vietnam Vet, Korean War Vet & WW II Vet & compare their answers (that's the one that you ans. already).

The other assignment was to ask questions of a Vietnam Vet & someone who lived during the Vietnam war but was not a soldier. My mom's cousin already answered the part of the non-soldier. A guy my Dad works with was going to do the Vietnam Vet part, but apparently he was uncomfortable answering some of the questions because of what his role was in the war?? Could you possibly take a few more minutes and answer these other questions? Thanks - Alex

From: rejordan79@msn.com
To: rtjordan@rockwellcollins.com
Subject: Vietnam Vet Interview -
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 06:54:38 -0700

Needs to interview two people and compare answers - 1 a Vietnam vet & 1 someone that lived during the Vietnam war era but was not a soldier.

For non-soldier:

1) What were you doing when the Vietnam war was going on?

2) Why were you not involved in service?

3) What are your views on the war?

4) Did you protests against the war?

5) How do you feel about the veterans who served?

6) Did you have any friends or relatives in the war and how did you feel about that?

7) What was the purposes of the war?


For Vietnam vet:

1) What was your rank?
2nd Lieutenant, promoted to 1st Lieutenant, then to Captain

2) What was your daily routine like? (Example: duties)
Get up about 5 a.m. Shower and shave. Eat breakfast at the Officer's Club. Go to the Operations center, where I would meet with the crew. We would get a weather briefing, then an intelligence briefing (where were the antiaircraft guns and any other threats and escape and evasion [E&E] procedures), and a mission briefing (what are we supposed to do that day ). Then I would brief the crew on what procedures I expected them to follow. Pick up weapons (.38 cal. pistol), radios, and extra batteries. Then take a crew bus (it looked like a UPS truck) to the flight line. Pre-flight the aircraft, looking for mechanical or electrical problems.
Fly the mission for 7 hours. Start-up, take-off, climb, cruise the mission area, do the mission, cruise home, descend, land, reset the aircraft. Debrief intel on what we saw and did.
Crew bus back to the barracks. (2 people in a room with 2 beds, a desk, two lockers, and a refrigerator.) Shower, go to an on-base Chinese restaurant for dinner. Possibly watch a movie at an out-door theater or watch a [very bad] band at the Officer's club. Check mail, then write a letter home. Sometimes, go to town via the 5 cent bus.


3) What was the food like?
Standard restaurant fare. The Chinese restaurant offered "Kobe" beef, but it was really water buffalo.

4) What was the most difficult time?
Hard to choose. Weather was a major problem for the monsoon half of the year. The most difficult was probably when I was chased by a Mig fighter out of Hanoi. I was the only plane in northern Laos at the time, when the radar picket plane told me that a "fast-mover" had launched from Hanoi, North Vietnam, aiming for me. I was unarmed, except for my pistol and he could fly about 10 times faster than me. There was a thunderstorm nearby, so I went inside of that. He could not follow there. The radar plane sent an RF-4 from Cambodia in my direction. The North Vietnamese radar saw him an pulled their plane back. The RF-4 was also unarmed, but they did not know that.

5) What did you think of the country? (ex: surroundings, people, weather, standard of living)
The surroundings were standard 3rd world. The people were friendly, possibly because they had to be. The weather was tropical: beautiful 6 months of the year and daily thunderstorms during the monsoon season. They did not have moving weather "fronts" as we do. Storms would grow in one spot, every afternoon, and dump a lot of water on that one spot. The standard of living was low, but adequate for most. The samlar (pedicab) drivers could live on 5 cents per day, cooking rice in the streets. A local could live in a western style house, wearing western cloths, for about $35 per month.

6) What stands out the most in your memory?
Again, hard to choose. The weather was really tough during the monsoon. We usually had to penetrate a thunderstorm to get home in the afternoon and they were big, tough thunderstorms. One time I had to shut down one of our two engines before flying home. According to the charts, I could hold 5,000 feet on one engine. As I went through the storm, I noticed my altitude was 11,000 feet and I was still going up as fast as the indicator would display. The planes were very old and leaked so badly that we wore ponchos in the cockpit and could hardly see the instruments. It was a tough flight.

7) Did you have any contact with Agent Orange?
I watched the C-123 "Ranch Hand" aircraft spraying below us. I tried to stay clear.

8) Are you glad you went and would you do it again?
Yes. It was the great adventure of my life.

9) What did you think of the people back home protesting?
I thought they were very mis-informed. They were basically supporting the enemy. We lost because of them.

10) Has the Vietnam vet been treated fairly?
Yes, until recently. The Obama administration requires vets to get their own health insurance, even if they were wounded in combat.

11) Was it worth it?
Yes. See answer 7.

12) Do you think there was other options in which the way the Americans fought the war? (ex: nuclear weapons, more troops, all out victory)
Absolutely. The politicians dictated every move and made no attempt to actually win the war. Once the politicians start a war, they should get out of the way and let the military end it ( as was done in WW II.)

13) What was the purpose of the war?
The purpose was to contain Communist expansion in Asia and prevent the Domino Effect.

Sunday, March 07, 2010

Alyssa scores big at the Celebrity Dance competition in Ames

Alyssa has been at the Celebrity dance competition in Ames this weekend.

On Friday, 2 of her dances got Platinum (highest rating, very nearly perfect); her solo was the 2nd highest score of the day.

Saturday, she got 2 more platinums AND was invited to the National Competition as a faculty staff member, not as a competitor. She goes to Phoenix for a week of Intensives and training, then they fly her to Miami where she will be a Celebrity Crew staff member, giving both performances and instructing competitors.

What a great resume builder.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Generic Repair Process

Things break. Stuff happens. Here is a one-size=fits-all repair process [in order]:
  1. Turn it off, then on. For computers try a restart, then hard reboot.
  2. Rap it sharply with the heel of your hand or the heel of your boot (brogan maintenance)
    [I know, we are talking about repair and not maintenance]
  3. Unplug it and replug it
  4. Take it apart and reassemble it. Discard remaining parts.
  5. Use outside repair [store, manufacturer, or on-site repairman.]
  6. Read the instructions.

Friday, November 06, 2009

Words I can't remember.

1. Anabasis: (from Greek ana = "upward", bainein = "go") is an expedition from a coastline up into the interior of a country. Katabasis, or catabasis, (from Greek κατὰ, "down" βαίνω "go") is a descent of some type. Katabasis may be a moving downhill, a sinking of winds, a military retreat, or a trip to the underworld. It may also mean a trip from the interior of a country down to the coast, and has related meanings in poetry, rhetoric, and modern psychology.

2. Amanesis: An oral history, given by a patient to his doctor. Heteroanamnesis is an oral history given by someone other than the patient. The process is outlined in a Wikipedia article.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Shortage of Short Greeks Ruining Us

By Mike Royko
The Chicago Daily News published this column on Dec. 5, year unknown.
This is classic, found all over the Internet. I found it here.

The moment we sat down for lunch, I knew it was a mistake. It was one of those cute new yuppie-poo restaurants with ferns and a menu that listed calories.

I knew it was an even bigger mistake when five minutes passed before the busboy dropped the silverware and napkins in front of us.

About 10 minutes later, I snared a waitress as she was hurrying by and asked: "Is there any chance we can see a menu?"

"I'm so sorry," she said. "We're short-handed. One of the girls didn't show up today."

When she finally brought the food it wasn't what I had ordered.

"There are some problems in the kitchen," she said. "We have a new cook."

"Never mind," I said. "I'll eat it, whatever it is. But what about the beer?

"Oh, I forgot, you wanted a beer," she said. The beer arrived just in time to wash down the last bite of the sandwich.

When she brought the check, which was wrong because she charged me for what I ordered instead of what I got, I asked: "Who runs this place?"

"The manager?" she said. "He's in the end booth having lunch."

On the way out, I stopped at the manager's booth. He was a yuppie in a business suit. He and a clone were leisurely sipping their coffee and looking at a computer print-out.

"Nice place you have here," I lied. "Do you own it?"

The young man shook his head. It was owned by one of those big corporations that operates restaurants in far-flung office buildings and health clubs.

He also proudly told me that he had recently left college with a degree in restaurant and hotel management.

That explained it all. His waitresses were short-handed, his cook was goofing up the orders, the customers were fuming, and what was he doing?

He was having lunch. Or, as he'd probably say, he was doing lunch.

I don't want to be an alarmist, but when this nation collapses, he and those like him will be the cause.

First, we had the MBA - especially the Harvard MBA - who came along after World War II and took over American industry. With his bottom-line approach, the MBA did such a brilliant job that the Japanese might soon buy the whole country and evict us.

But we're told not to worry. Now that we don't manufacture as much as we used to, we'll be saved by the growing service industry.

The problem is that the service industry is being taken over by people like the restaurant manager and his corporation. They go to college and study service. Then they install computers programmed for service. And they have meetings and look at service charts and graphs and talk about service.

But what they don't do is provide service. That's because they are not short Greeks.

You probably wonder what that means. I'll explain.

If that corporation expects the restaurant to succeed, it should fire the young restaurant-hotel degree holder. Or demote him to cleaning washrooms.

It should then go to my friend Sam Sianis, who owns Billy Goat's Tavern, and say: "Do you know a short Greek that wants to manage a restaurant?"

Sam will say: "Shoo. I send you one my cousins. Jus' got here from the old country."

Then he'd go to Greek Town and tell his cousin, who works as a waiter, that his big chance had come.

When the next lunch hour rolled around, and a waitress failed to show up for work, Sam's cousin would not sit down to do lunch. He would put on an apron and wait tables himself.

If the cook goofed up orders, Sam's cousin would go into the kitchen, pick up a cleaver, and say, "You want I keel you?"

He wouldn't know how to read a computer printout, but he'd get drinks in the glasses, food on the table, and money in the cash register.

That simple approach is why restaurants run by short Greeks stay in business and make money. And why restaurants that are run by corporations and managed by young men who are educated beyond their intelligence come and go. And mostly go.

So if you are ever approached by a stockbroker who wants to sell you shares in any of the giant service corporations, tell him not to bother showing you the annual report. Just ask him one question.

"Is it run by short Greeks?"

If he says no, leave your money under the mattress.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

How to Improve Your Vision in Five Easy Steps

Matthew E. May (In Pursuit of Elegance) found here.

Sep 22, 2009 -

In my previous post, The Art of Visual Thinking, I told the story of how Kerry Morrison catalyzed the renewal of Hollywood underway through her ability to paint a vivid picture of the present and the desired future. In this companion piece, I explain how to hone the visualization skills of your team with a practical exercise.

The first part of the activity is a “heads up” that draws out the dream of the team. The second part of the meeting is “sleeves up,” to focus energy on a real world strategy that achieves the dream. The exercise is designed to be fast-paced, highly interactive, and visually oriented. Here’s how it works:

  1. Hammer out a vision: Our Company R.I.P. (forty-five minutes) The goal of this activity is to get to the big picture and bring the future to the present so that it can be addressed. The traditional approach is to write a success story for the media as if it were some number of years or months in the future. But a better way, albeit unconventional, is to draft a detailed corporate obituary.

    This is what Kerry Morrison did in her interview since Hollywood already was dead at the time. The outcome is a much more realistic and vivid picture of perfection, but in exact reverse. What would the article say about your organization’s demise? What would the headline read?

  2. Remove obstacles. (forty-five minutes) Understanding what the goal or vision isn’t is often more important than understanding what it is because this process outlines the restraints and obstacles. The reality is that restraints always rule. For most people, painting the disaster scene provides more accessible mental images because they’ve seen these situations before. When the roadblocks appear in the future, they are more easily recognized and effectively addressed.

    To do this, make a master list of all the items identified in the obituary—the company “killers.” To the right of each deadly factor, list the countermeasure. What is the opposite of the ailment? How will each obstacle be overcome or avoided? These now become the critical success factors that form the framework of the future vision.

  3. Set goals. (thirty minutes) For each success factor, list a key objective or measurable goal. Use the list you just developed to spark a discussion of the major goals. Combine ideas, wordsmith, refine, remove—whatever is needed to arrive at what the group agrees is a comprehensive list of goals incorporating all the critical ideas from the visioning exercise.

  4. Prioritize. (thirty minutes) There’s nothing sophisticated here: have each individual write down what they believe are the three most important goals. Then go down the list and ask for a show of hands indicating how many chose each item as the number-one priority. Tally the votes to identify the top five.

  5. Form projects. (thirty minutes) Now turn the top five priorities into key projects, assign a champion, and put thought into who does what by when. Don’t make this exhaustive and detailed logistics planning, but rather high-level action planning.
You now have working template from which future planning can be conducted. Companies spend days in off-site retreats developing visions and strategies. You can do it in about three hours if you follow this procedure.

Matthew E. May is the author of
In Pursuit of Elegance: Why the Best Ideas Have Something Missing, and blogs here. You can follow him on Twitter here.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Grant Writing Tips

Notes from a Federal Reviewer as found in a Grantstation article.

by Sandra Jewell, Grant Writing Consultant and Writer

The Objective (Peer) Review

"The applications have arrived and the objective review begins."

The central procedure in the federal funding cycle is the objective, or peer, review, which is carefully, legally, designed to maintain the integrity of the decision making process.

Before the peer review panel meets, non-voting (technical) reviewers from the branch sponsoring the RFA vet each application to ensure its compliance with the goals of the branch.

Because objective review is so crucial to the ethical strength of the process, the peer reviewers who score the application are never from the branch soliciting the proposal because the likely applicants are generally constituents of that branch, sometimes known personally to branch staff.

The grant writer would do well to remember that funding decisions rest largely in the hands of reviewers who almost certainly have no direct experience with the subject area.

There are other important issues to remember when replying to an RFA:

First, no one is ever hired by an agency specifically to review grant applications. Reviewers take time away from their day jobs, usually in other parts of the agency, to do this as a service to the soliciting branch. They also know that their branch will need reviewers for their own RFAs.

The reviewer is often given three to five applications to evaluate within a brief time frame. Before the review panel meets, s/he first must invest the considerable effort needed to get up to speed with a new subject area and with the needs of the funding branch as documented in the RFA and any supporting materials. The next step is to read and score the applications, each of which can easily require a full day, and then to spend one or more days participating on the panel.

The entire review process is a massive investment of time and emotional energy and can leave reviewers bleary eyed.

It’s been said that half of all grant applications are poorly written, which may be an underestimate. And to be honest, almost all applications make for tedious reading for reviewers who, as mentioned earlier, are rarely more than temporarily and peripherally involved in the subject.

There are several strategies to consider when developing a response to an RFA that will reinvigorate a reviewer:

First, to help ensure that a proposal ends up in the fundable range, which will generally be well above 90 points on a scale to 100, present a great, new, idea. Reviewers love to have the possibility of helping along a creative and significant initiative.

Although grant writers may have little control over the proposed project, they have considerable control over something equally essential: its presentation. If a grant writer can create an application that is professional, well written, and responsive without being terminally colorless, reviewers will be grateful. More important, they’ll pay attention.

Here are a few more suggestions:

Many requirements are included in an RFA but one of the most crucial is unwritten: Responders must convince the reviewer that the proposal is important. Every word in the application should be strictly, concisely, targeted to that goal. That means that the writer should diligently avoid unexplained assumptions and field-specific jargon.

Conversely, there is no point in over explaining anything that is common knowledge. Reviewers may regard too much irrelevant verbiage as a loss of focus within the proposal and, worse, have their own attentiveness derailed by insignificant details.

No matter how good the idea, it’s not going to sell itself. So, right up front in the beginning paragraphs of the narrative, tell the reader why this proposal is worth doing. Never assume that the reviewer knows or will spend extra time filling in gaps that should be part of the presentation. If applicable, spell out what is known, what is unknown, and where the proposed activities fit. Bring the reviewer up to speed at the start or risk the possibility of permanently losing traction.

Don’t underestimate the potential for confounding the reviewer in the dozens of pages of detail that comprise the usual application. Eliminate cross references that require diversions to another part of the proposal and, where feasible, include an abstract-type summary of each section.

Applications that do well are concise and clear. They flow. They have none of the confusing juxtapositions and inconsistencies that so often baffle and frustrate reviewers. They tell why the project activities are needed, what the applicant expects to achieve, and the methods that will be used. They explain how their progress will be assessed and what happens if and when federal funding ends. Depending on the RFA and agency goals, reviewers often expect funded proposals to be eventually self sustaining.

The application should be internally consistent. Nothing is quite as unmistakable, or as jarring, as an application put together by a number of writers with different writing styles. To get the money in cases like this, someone must do the editing.

In terms of style, another extreme is the application transparently created by a coolly disinterested, professional grant writer. Occasionally an application is so slick it reads as though it was untouched by human hands, sort of like a house decorated by Holiday Inn. Proposals that sound as though humans are only an after thought rarely do well in the review process.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Where Have All The Leaders Gone?

Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from its death throes? He's now 82 years old and has a new book, 'Where Have All The Leaders Gone?'.

Lee Iacocca Says:

'Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the heck is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder! We've got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, 'Stay the course..'

Stay the course? You've got to be kidding. This is America , not the dang, 'Titanic'. I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the bums out!'

You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore..

The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs.. While we're fiddling in Iraq , the Middle East is burning and nobody seems to know what to do. And the press is waving 'pom-poms' instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of the ' America ' my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you?

I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The Biggest 'C' is Crisis! (Iacocca elaborates on nine C's of leadership, with crisis being the first.)

Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's easy to sit there with your feet up on the desk and talk theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down.

On September 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes. A hell of a mess, so here's where we stand.

We're immersed in a bloody war with no plan for winning and no plan for leaving.

We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the country.

We're losing the manufacturing edge to Asia , while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs.

Gas prices are skyrocketing, and nobody in power has a coherent energy policy. Our schools are in trouble.

Our borders are like sieves.

The middle class is being squeezed every which way.

These are times that cry out for leadership.

But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the leaders gone?' Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, omnipotence, and common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get the point.

Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo?

We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened.

Name me one leader who emerged from the crisis of Hurricane Katrina. Congress has yet to spend a single day evaluating the response to the hurricane or demanding accountability for the decisions that were made in the crucial hours after the storm.

Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping it doesn't happen again. Now, that's just crazy. Storms happen.. Deal with it. Make a plan. Figure out what you're going to do the next time.

Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have believed that there could ever be a time when 'The Big Three' referred to Japanese car companies? How did this happen, and more important, what are we going to do about it?

Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying down the debit, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that are eating away at our country and milking the middle class dry.

I have news for the gang in Congress. We didn't elect you to sit on your asses and do nothing and remain silent while our democracy is being hijacked and our greatness is being replaced with mediocrity. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bonehead on NBC news or CNN news will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change?

Had Enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope - I believe in America . In my lifetime, I've had the privilege of living through some of America 's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises: The 'Great Depression,' 'World War II,' the 'Korean War,' the 'Kennedy Assassination,' the 'Vietnam War,' the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years culminating with 9/11.

If I've learned one thing, it's this: 'You don't get anywhere by standing on the sidelines waiting for somebody else to take action. Whether it's building a better car or building a better future for our children, we all have a role to play. That's the challenge I'm raising in this book. It's a "Call to Action" for people who, like me, believe in America '. It's not too late, but it's getting pretty close. So let's shake off the crap and go to work. Let's tell 'em all we've had 'enough.'

Make your own contribution by sending this to everyone you know and care about. It's our country, folks, and it's our future. Our future is at stake!!

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Perry Noble: I Principles for Leading a Team

Perry Noble article:
I recently sat down with all of our worship leaders here at NewSpring Church for two hours…it was seriously an amazing series of conversations.

At one point, Lee McDerment, our worship leader at the Anderson campus asked me, “What are some things all of us need to keep in mind as we lead teams.”  I gave a decent answer … but after I got back to my office I began to write my thoughts down … and here are eight things I believe that every leader needs to keep in mind when leading a team.

#1 – You will never effectively motivate someone with feelings of guilt
I’ve made that mistake as a leader before, thinking if I could just get someone to feel bad they would do a better job … WRONG!  No one has ever brought about significant change in the world because guilt propelled them to do so.  AND … if a leader finds himself always motivating by guilt … he will also soon find himself without anyone to lead.  NO ONE likes going on a guilt trip.

#2 – People don’t respond to need – they respond to vision
When a leader talks about a need, some people will respond.  BUT, when a leader can cast a compelling vision about what SHOULD BE and with God’s grace and our participation, WOULD BE CHANGE HAPPENS!  Many times a team leader will drift off course NOT because they are lazy and/or pathetic, but because maybe they have forgotten why they do what they do and a shot of vision will cure that every time.

#3 – A person cannot be held accountable for unspoken expectations
Another mistake I’ve made in the past as a leader is assuming people could read my mind and so when they didn’t do what I thought should have been done I would get angry with them.  After some very confusing looks and some really tough conversations I began to realize that I was expecting things out of people that I hadn’t clearly explained!  Our job as leaders is to give clear, realistic expectations and then resource the people to make those things happen.

#4 – Keep short accounts
The Bible says in Ephesians 4:26-27 that we are to not let the sun go down on us while we are angry.  In other words, we should act with URGENCY when it comes to conflict among the teams we lead.  Unresolved conflict is like cancer that begins to eat away at the body.  It must be dealt with OR its destruction will bring about death.  Many leaders RUN FROM conflict because it is uncomfortable, but I’ve learned the hard way that we must embrace a little discomfort now or A LOT of it in the future!

#5 – Don’t be afraid to set high standards
One of the problems I’ve discovered when it comes to leadership in the Church is that some people are perfectly fine with setting the bar of excellence really low ... and then allowing the people they lead to crawl under it.  I know leaders who literally fear that if they set high standards that people will get offended.  However, the thing I’ve learned around here at NewSpring is if we DON’T set high standards people do not feel challenged … which leads to boredom!  (BTW … I said “high standards,” not “unrealistic ones!”)

#6 – Beware of the all-star
One of the things that cripples any team is when it has an all star who believes ministry simply cannot take place without them.  And when a leader begins to believe that about an individual on the team then they will often fear what might happen if the all-star left rather than what would happen if the presence of God left!!!  Every “star player” who truly has an intimate walk with God understands that it’s the TEAMWORK that makes the DREAMWORK – period.

#7 – Each team member is a human being
The leader who views the team he leads as people who are assembled to do what he wants them to do and that’s it sucks as a leader!  A leader MUST care about the people he leads and NOT just the tasks they perform.  If a team member sees themselves as merely a tool in the leaders hand rather than a valued team member … they will soon be looking to join another team.

#8 – Ask questions
One of the biggest mistakes a leader can make is assuming that they have to have the answer to every question that comes their way.  (BTW … NO leader is that good!)  One of the things I am realizing more and more is how incredibly gifted and talented the people around me are … and over the past several years I’ve asked this question in so many meetings when someone presents an issue to me, “So, what do you think we should do?”  Often times the person already has the solution planned out … which saves me (and everyone else on the team) all kinds of time and energy!  The reason God blesses a leader with a team is so that leader can harness the collective wisdom of everyone involved and make the best decision.
Besides … people ARE going to share their opinion somewhere … a leader might as well be the first to hear it … because it can save a lot of problems in the future.

One more thing … the only reasons a leader might not ask questions is because he is insecure (thinks doing so will show weakness), full of pride (thinks he is better than everyone else) or fear (because he knows the answer he is going to hear from the team is the right one – but not the one he prefers!)

Perry Noble is the Senior Pastor of NewSpring Church in Anderson, Greenville and Florence, South Carolina. At just nine years old the church averages over 10,000 people during weekend services and is launching another campus in Columbia, South Carolina this year to reach even more people.

4 Comments


  1. I enjoyed your “8 Principles to leading a team”.
    I’m not a pastor, I’m a production supervisor at a large machine tool company and a Coach on my son’s basketball teams.
    Team building is a specialty of mine.
    A few observations…
    Vision isn’t just important, it’s vital.
    Developing a vision for a team and effectively communicating it and enrolling the right people into it IS leadership to me.
    Set high standards and clear expectations, yes…then hold people accountable to the commitments they make regarding a project. I prefer people to step up for jobs and then own them. And most will push to see if they are going to be held accountable or allowed to slide through assignments.
    It’s human nature.
    If I’m firm, fair and consistent with following up, the team will keep the momentum.
    If not, the project will die.
    Treat team members as human beings, ...yes.
    To me that means learning about and understanding their strengths and weaknesses. What do they bring to the team and when do I have THEM take the lead? Everybody should feel the heat/thrill of leading meetings, developing ideas, or running a fast break. I need to be able to move the chess pieces around and then step aside and watch them run with the ball. And, if it goes sideways, use that as a teachable moment. Pick them up, dust them off and compassionately walk them through the decisions made and let them see where the mistakes were made and how to correct them.
    “What could you have done differently?”
    Ask questions?
    Absolutely…and then LISTEN attentively.
    Your vision should be big enough to allowing some improvisation on the method of getting there.
    Agendas are made to be broken.
    Go with the flow of ideas that come from your team members and check your ego at the door.
    The team is greater than the sum of its parts…and that includes the leader!
    You’re really just the facillitator to the process of problem solving.
    When teams find their solution and contribute to the process, they get so fired up you may find yourself reigning them back in.
    That’s motivation!
    That’s what jumped out at me as I read your work.
    Hope this finds you well and leading from the heart!
    Rick Roman
    Comment by Rick Roman - Sep 07, 2009 @ 11:11 A

Blog Archive